|
SPUR Australia Home |
Latest News from Sri Lanka |
SPUR Media Releases |
News Archives |
Disclaimer
|
The 13th Amendment
|
|
The13 amendment 'The illegitimate
child of Indian expansionism and Sri Lankan political naivety'
By Dr Sudath Gunasekara (President
Senior citizen's movement Mahanuwara)
Now that once again the infamous and much debated 13th amendment is trying to
raise its ugly head, I thought it appropriate and timely too, to highlight few
critical issues on this subject in the broader interest of the nation so that it
will open the way for a nationwide public debate.
The 13th amendment was brought up in pursuance of the Indo-Sri Lanka
agreement of 29th July 1987 entered upon between Sri Lanka and India. This was
singed by J.R.Jayawardene, the then President of Sri Lanka and Rajive Ghandi the
Indian prime Minister. Though it was called an agreement, in reality it was the
will of the Indian government imposed on JRJ by the Indian government under the
able and cunning stewardship of Dixit the then Indian Ambassador in Sri Lanka.
We all know how it was preceded by the famous 'dhal invasion' of Jaffna
peninsular in August 1983, which demonstrated the high handed action on the part
of Indian expansionism. It was a blatant violation of all accepted international
diplomatic ethics. In fact we all still remember how Dixit summoned JRJ to his
office and got JRJ succumbed to his dictations under threats of imminent
invasion.
In the words of a group of patriotic people who made an analysis of it 'The
Indo-Lankan Agreement was an agreement between the two Heads of States that was
conceived, incubated and hatched in the greatest secrecy' until they were
singed. They were singed under a country wide curfew and a total press
censorship. Even the foreign Ministry was kept in the dark. Prime Minister
Premadasa stayed out of the country in protest. Minister of Internal Security
Lalith Atulathmudali also boycotted it. It was also singed under a country wide
protest organized by the opposition under Mrs. B's leadership. Thereafter JRJ
used his steam roller majority of 5/6th to get it passed by the Parliament. The
Chief Justice of the country also resigned and left for Australia in protest.
This was the backdrop under which JRJ used his dictatorial executive powers
to get the 13th amendment through. This scenario makes it more than clear that
he singed these agreements under pressure from India for his own political
survival. It is also not surprising that he did so, when we recollect that it
was he who said in 1920s that Sri Lanka of Dutugemunu and Parakramabahu is a
thing of the past and if you want to develop the country, Sri Lanka should be
affiliated to India as one of its regional states.
This tragic event in the political history of this country has once again
highlighted the mistake of leaving everything in the hands of power hungry
politicians, in matters dealing with the destiny of the nation. It also focuses
on the serious vacuum created by the tragedy of absence of powerful national
level leaders and organizations who can tame the politicians, when it comes to
issues that decide the future destiny of the country.
All in all this chain of events clearly demonstrate that the Indo- Sri Lankan
Agreements did not have the support of the masses in this country, in whose
hands lies the sovereignty of the Republic which is also said to be inalienable.
Obviously therefore the 13th amendment has violated article 3 of the
Constitution of Sri Lanka, although JRJ has legitimized it subsequently using
his dictatorial executive powers. The Indo-Sri Lanka agreement was the result of
a diabolical conspiracy hatched by India against Sri Lanka. It also has violated
the provisions of Article 1 of the constitution which says that 'Sri Lanka is a
Free, Sovereign and independent country etc. Thirdly since by establishing
provincial councils and the manner in which their functioning has been
maneuvered, the unitary status of the Republic is also violated. (Article 2).The
intension of the 13th amendment itself was not bon-fide. It was not enacted in
the broader interest of the country and its people. JR singed this for his own
survival and the survival of his government in the face the Indian threat.
One can argue that under the then prevailing rather sour Indo-Lankan
relations (for which JRJ and his government was responsible) he had no choice.
Therefore he had opted for the best choice in the interest of the country. But
that is only mere rhetoric. The content of the agreements and the subsequent
legislations (13th Amendment) clearly demonstrate how they have protected the
interests of this country. Even the removal of civil rights of Mrs. B is a part
and parcel of the same conspiracy.
Of the six amendments that were brought under the 13th amendment to the
constitution, only amendments 2 and 4 are discussed here. The 2nd amendment
amended Article 18 of the 1987 constitution which stated that the 'Official
language of Sri Lanka shall be Sinhala', making Tamil also an official language
of Sri Lanka. It also said English shall also be the link language. Amendment
4 on the other hand which amended sec 154 of the original Constitution added a
new Article as 154 Aunder a new chapter XV11A and it provided for the
establishment of the Provincial Councils. Under this it was proposed to
establish a Provincial Council for every Province.
Each Council to have a Governor who will exercise executive powers in
relation to subjects assigned to the Provincial councils. Legislative powers
will be carried out by the Provincial Council headed by a chief Minister and a
board of Ministers elected by the people of the Province. Wide and far reaching
powers were given to the Provincial councils under the Ninth Schedule List 1,
which is called the Provincial Council List. This includes practically all
powers pertaining to governance within the province including among other things
Land, Police powers, Legal powers tax and Finance These Councils were also given
powers even to negotiate with foreign governments and organizations. This has
been already done in the NWP when Jayawickrama Perera was the CM. Provision for
establishing 'Super Provinces' were made under Article 154A ,(3) by combining
two or three adjoining Provinces to form one administrative unit with one
elected Provincial Council, one Governor, one Chief Minister and one Board of
Ministers.
The main purpose of the Indo Sri Lanka Agreement was to find solutions to the
so called ethnic problem said to be present here and find a solution to the
North- East problem and restore peace and normalcy in the country. But it is
rather ironical that it also included a clause to make Tamil also an official
language and for repatriation of the estate Tamils who had already been declared
to be Indian citizens. These manipulations and the proposal to establish nine
Provincial councils on the Indian model and some times even going beyond in
matters of devolution are definitely sinister moves on the part of subversive
Indian politics.
What was even more serious were the provisions made to amalgamate two or
three provinces to form one Provincial council? Here they went further by
providing for a referendum to be held for the people of those provinces only to
decide whether they should stay together as one administrative unit or get back
to their status quo. This again is a nullification of the sovereignty of the
people of this country. Probably the designers of this sinister plan would have
had the North, East and the Uva or the Central Provinces where there is a
majority Tamil population to form in to this happy pro-Indian Tamil nadu within
Sri Lanka. The fact that Saumya Moorthi Thondaman has already had discussions
prior to this event at Ella Rest House with some foreign donor agencies to
construct a super high way to link Nuwara Eliya and Badulla with Batticaloa
support this argument and conspiracy.
In fact the recommendation of Provincial Councils for the other provinces as
well was made only to hoodwink the southern people. In reality India wanted them
only for the East, North and another Province of their choice, where there was a
sizable Tamil population. Following the 13th amendment fortunately only the
North and East provinces were merged and that also had to be dissolved after
Vardharaja Perumal declared independence. The proposed referendum for the people
of the two Provinces to decide whether they should remain as one or two was
never held. After nearly fifteen years of debate, thanks to the JVP who went to
courts, finally the North- East provinces were demerged and now the first danger
of Provinces getting together on an ethnic basis to form the Tamilnadu in Sri
Lanka, perhaps what the Indian had in their minds when they designed the
Agreement is no more there. It should be noted that even today Perumal is kept
as a 'state guest' by India.
Although the two Provinces have been demerged consequent to a court order we
cannot remain complacent that the danger is over particularly when we see the
emerging new moves, both in international and local lobby circles to implement
the 13th amendment. As we all know nearly for 15 years we did not have a
provincial council for the North and the East for which it was really intended.
Instead we have Provincial Councils in all other Provinces; causing an
additional burden to the coffers of the state and enormous confusion to the good
governance of this little Island nation. Since previously I have in several
occasions discussed at length the tragedy of the Provincial Councils, I do not
intend to deal further on that issue here. Instead now I will divert to a brief
discussion as to why the 13th amendment should not be taken up at this critical
moment of history of this Island nation.
As you would have already seen from the above observations neither the
Indo-Sri Lannkan Agreement nor the 13th Amendment was ever wanted by the people
of this country, with whom the country's sovereignty rests. The agreement was
something imposed from above by India against the wishes and sovereignty of the
people of this country and the 13th amendment was thrust upon the people by JRJ
to safeguard his political survival and none of the subsequent legislations were
passed or implemented in the interest of the recipient country or its people.
Three major things happened as a sequel to the 13th amendment. They were
unprecedented and critical too, in the context of the political future of this
country.
1. Setting up of 8 Provincial Councils 2.
Making Tamil also an official
language (perhaps the only country in the world with two official
languages) 3. Repatriation of nearly 500,000 estate Tamils who should have
been otherwise sent to India under the then prevailing laws
Establishment of Provincial Councils was the biggest bane in this game. It
not only strengthened the political boundaries set by the British for the
permanent division of the Island in 1889 but it also further polarized the
minority groups, both Tamils and Muslims who were clamoring for separation. The
establishment of PCC also has multiplied the political and administrative
institutions, which have in turn increased the government's expenditure with
almost zero returns. State of California in USA, six times larger than Sri
Lanka, has only one Governor but this tiny Island has nine governors and nine
Provincial Councils with a top heavy expensive state machinery over burdened
with politicians and officials. For whose benefit do they exist? The increases
in the number of political institutions, politicians, officials, offices and
connected expenditure to maintain them were phenomenal and unbearable for a
small country like ours. The waste, corruption, duplication etc also have
unprecedentedly increased in keeping with the Parkinson's Law.
The new system also has increased ethnic polarization. Neither the LTTE
terrorism nor the tendency for ethnic segregation among the Tamils has ceased or
decreased as a result of this agreements or the implementation of the 13th
amendment. Instead all problems in all fronts have escalated and it has even
given new inspiration to Muslims and the estate Tamils also to agitate for
separation. The proportional representation system of elections introduced by
the 1987 constitution has made things even worse by complicating the election
process and adding to the cost and above all alienating the elected from the
voter and creating electorates without representatives; thereby making
representative democracy a big mocker and a joke in this country.
As such the remedy recommended has now become worse than the malady itself.
Therefore it could be safely stated that the overall outcome of this whole
exercise has been disastrous to this country's future. It only has consolidated
the sinister intensions of colonial policies of divide and rule and the
intentions of India of balancing political power at home and keeping Sri Lanka
destabilized. The continuation of this system could be even more disastrous for
the future of this country both politically as well as economically. What this
country needs today is not policies that perpetuate and accelerate the
disintegration of the Sri Lankan State but to look for ways and means of
re-establishing the political stability, once we had in this country for
millennia.
Therefore it is high time that we drop this curse and political cancer, the
trap laid by the colonial masters by marking them on ground as well as in the
minds of the minorities and that was given political and legal meaning and
substance by India, at least now, and go for some pragmatic and meaningful
system like the ancient 'Tun Rata' concept which will not only once again bring
back political stability and ethnic harmony but also economic and social
prosperity to this Island as one nation. I think Sri Lanka has already
established an unbeatable world record as the country that has the highest
number of Ministers, politicians and public officials, political and
administrative institutions and that spends the highest percentage of the
national income to maintain them, compared with other countries in the whole
world. This also means the biggest burden to the public coffers adding very
little or nil to national production.
The Provincial Council system and proliferation of unwanted and superficial
public institutions is one of the biggest burdens we face today as a nation.
Arresting proliferation of both political and administrative institutions
therefore is a sine qua non, if any one is serious in good governance that marks
efficiency, honesty and economy, in this country. The existing system only
accelerates negativity in nation building and distances us far and further away
from positivity. Why should this country labour the luxury of maintaining 874
politicians (including 9 Governors and 155 Ministers) when it could be run more
efficiently with about 280 politicians and 25 Government Agents as shown below
after devolution of power to Three political divisions and decentralization of
administration to 25 districts.? See the following table for
details.
Present Proposed President 1 1 Prime Minister 1
1 Governors 9 3 Present Proposed Parliament PCs Par. PCs MPP 225 638
125 150 Ministers 109 45 15 45 Total 225 638 125 150 Total 11+225+638=
874 5+ 125+150=280
This is on the assumption that the country will be governed by one
government at the centre with a Parliament headed by a President and three
Rata Sabhas, Ruhunu, Pihiti and Maya. As it is I think Sri Lanka has the
highest number of politicians and political institution in the including
Minister and Ministries and public servants in the whole world. The
expenditure incurred on this machinery therefore in y opinion is a
criminal wastage. It could be reduced at least by 50% and that could be
gainfully diverted to national development if we adopt the proposed system.
In this backdrop my view is, that not only the 13th amendment should be
scrapped but the 1987 Constitution itself should ne replaced with a new one
that could bring about political stability and balanced development in the
country.
Source URL http://www.lankaweb.com/news/items08/201108-1.html
Wednesday, 19 November 2008
Disclaimer: Comments, views and opinions contained in this website are personal reflections only and do not necessarily reflect the views of SPUR Online in Australia. SPUR Online in Australia offers the contents of this website without charge, but does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed within. Neither SPUR Online in Australia nor the individual authors of any material on this Web site accept responsibility for any loss or damage, however caused (including through negligence), which you may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of your use of or reliance on information contained on or accessed through this Web site. Responsibility and liability of using comments, views and opinions presented in this website rests solely with the user and not with SPUR Online in Australia. � 1998-2009 SPUR Australia.
What is really happening
in Sri Lanka today is that a blood thirsty racist group led by
some misled Tamils called LTTE is terrorizing against the Government
of Sri Lanka and its people irrespective of their ethnicity with an
intention of carving out a separate state. There is no conflict as
such between Sinhalese and Tamil communities in Sri Lanka. In fact,
the majority of the Tamil community lives in peace and harmony among
the Sinhalese population through out the country apart from the
Northern part of Sri Lanka. The entire Sinhalese and the Muslims
population who lived in the Northern area for centuries were either
killed or chased away completely by the LTTE Tamil Tiger terrorists.
At the moment, not a single Sinhalese or Muslim is living in Jaffna,
but, many thousands of Tamils are living in Colombo in peace with
the other communities. Based on 2001 census, the Tamil population in
Colombo district is 12.1% ( see
2001 census). So, who is discriminated ? Tamils or Sinhalese? Do
you need more evidence ?
 |
Caution:
Images shown on this web site exposing LTTE Tamil Tiger Terrorist atrocities
maybe disturbing for some users. Please proceed at your own discretion. |
 |
The United States' top intelligence
agency, Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) says that the Liberation Tigers of
Tamil Eelam (LTTE) is the most dangerous and deadly extremist organization in the
world. The official website of FBI in its tops story said that LTTE is far more
dangerous terrorists outfit than al Queda, Hezbullah or even HAMAS.
Read more... |
SPUR Australia Home |
Latest News from Sri Lanka |
SPUR Media Releases |
News Archives |
Disclaimer
Back to the top
|